SuperlawGH

Case Briefs

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd [1952] 2 QB 795 (Court of Queen’s Bench) [1953] 1 QB 401 (CA) In the case of Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd, the defendant, Boots faced charges under the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1933, section 18, which mandated […]

Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash Chemists (Southern) Ltd Read More »

Case Brief: Gibson v Manchester City Council

In Gibson v Manchester City Council [1979] 1 WLR 294 (HL), the case revolved around the Council’s policy of selling council houses to tenants. The respondent tenant applied for details regarding the price and mortgage terms using a printed form. In response, the city treasurer sent a letter indicating that the Council “may be prepared

Case Brief: Gibson v Manchester City Council Read More »

Case Brief: Central London Property Trust Ltd. v High Trees House Ltd.

Central London Property Trust Ltd. v High Trees House Ltd. [1947] KB 130 In September 1937, the plaintiffs let a block of flats in London to the defendants for a term of 99 years at a rent of £2,500 a year. In 1940, owing to the wartime conditions and bombing raids over London, only a

Case Brief: Central London Property Trust Ltd. v High Trees House Ltd. Read More »

Case Brief: Peter Adjei v Margaret Adjei Civil Appeal No: J4/06/2021

Case Brief: Peter Adjei v Margaret Adjei CORAM: APPAU, JSC (PRESIDING) PWAMANG, JSCAMADU, JSC JSC DORDZIE (MRS.), JSC LOVELACE-JOHNSON (MS.), JSC 3-2 Decision. CIVIL APPEAL NO. J4/06/2021 21 ST APRIL, 2021 Court Opinion was read by Appau JSC An appeal emanating from the High Court where the man as petitioner sought to dissolve a 12-year

Case Brief: Peter Adjei v Margaret Adjei Civil Appeal No: J4/06/2021 Read More »

Case Brief: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.

Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. [1893] 1 QB 256 (CA) The defendants, who made and sold a medical product called ‘The Carbolic Smoke Ball’, issued an advertisement in a number of newspapers in the following terms: £100 reward will be paid by the Carbolic Smoke Ball Company to any person who contracts the increasing

Case Brief: Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co. Read More »

error: Copying is Not permitted.
Scroll to Top