Judgements

HIGH COURT  ABBAN J   CASES REFERRED TO (1)    Bardi v. Maurice (1954) 14 W.A.C.A. 414. (2)    Stuart v. Bell [1891] 2 Q.B. 341; 60 L.J.Q.B. 577; 64 L.T. 633; 39 W.R. 612; 7 T.L.R. 502, C.A. (3)    Adam v. Ward [1917] A.C. 309; 86 L.J.K.B. 849; 117 L.T. 34; 33 T.L.R. 277 H.L. (4)

ASIBEY III AND OTHERS v. AYISI [1972] 1 GLR 102 COURT OF APPEAL Date: 31 JULY 1972 BEFORE: AZU CRABBE J.S.C., LASSEY AND ARCHER JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Odoi v. Hammond [1971] 1 G.L.R. 375, C.A. (2) Appiah v. Baabu, Court of Appeal, 15 May 1967, unreported. (3) Wuta-Ofei v. Dove, Supreme Court, 18

ASANTE v. THE REPUBLIC [1972] 2 GLR 177 HIGH COURT, SUNYANI Date: 10 APRIL 1972 BEFORE: ANTERKYI J. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Kenlin v. Gardiner [1967] 2 Q.B. 510; [1967] 2 W.L.R. 129; [1966] 3 All E.R. 931; 131 J.P. 91; 110 S.J. 848, D.C. (2) R. v. Wilson [1955] 1 W.L.R. 493; 119 J.P.

HIGH COURT, CAPE COAST Date:   4 NOVEMBER 1974 EDWARD WIREDU J   CASES REFERRED TO (1)    Barnard v. National Dock Labour Board [1953] 2 Q. B. 18; [1953] 1 All E.R. 1113; 96 S.J. 331; [1953] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 371, C.A. (2)    Republic v. Inspector-General of Police; Ex parte Wood [1973] 2 G.L.R. 113. (3)

HIGH COURT, ACCRA Date:    4 DECEMBER 1973 ABOAGYE J   NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS CROSS-PETITION for divorce on the ground that the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation. The facts are sufficiently stated in the judgment. COUNSEL R. K Tay for Amoo-Lamptey for the petitioner. R. K Korsah (Agbesi with him) for the respondent cross-petitioner. [p.134]

SUPREME COURT, ACCRA DATE: 21ST DECEMBER, 1962 BEFORE: SARKODEE-ADOO, MILLS-ODOI AND AKUFO-ADDO, JJ.S.C. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Darcy v. Allen (1602) Moo. K.B. 671; 72 E.R. 830. (2) British Movietonews Ltd. v. London and District Cinemas Ltd. [1950] 2 All E.R. 390, C.A. (3) Parkinson (Sir Lindsay) & Co. v. Commissioners of His Majesty’s Works

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT AD 2008 CORAM:-    DATE-BAH, J.S.C. (PRESIDING) ANSAH, J.S.C. OWUSU, J.S.C. DOTSE, J.S.C. ANIN YEBOAH, J.S.C.  12th NOVEMBER. 2008   JUDGMENT DR. DATE-BAH. J.S.C: This case, with respect, is based on a flawed conception of the nature of a contract of employment. A contract of employment

HIGH COURT, ACCRA DATE: 9TH APRIL, 1962 BEFORE: JIAGGE, J. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS ACTION for recovery of family properties and for accounts. COUNSEL Y. Asare for G. Koranteng-Addow for the plaintiff. Defendants in person. JUDGMENT OF JIAGGE J. The plaintiff’s claim against the first defendant is for recovery of possession of the Osu Tetteh family