Judgements

HIGH COURT  ABBAN J   CASES REFERRED TO (1)    Bardi v. Maurice (1954) 14 W.A.C.A. 414. (2)    Stuart v. Bell [1891] 2 Q.B. 341; 60 L.J.Q.B. 577; 64 L.T. 633; 39 W.R. 612; 7 T.L.R. 502, C.A. (3)    Adam v. Ward [1917] A.C. 309; 86 L.J.K.B. 849; 117 L.T. 34; 33 T.L.R. 277 H.L. (4)

ASIBEY III AND OTHERS v. AYISI [1972] 1 GLR 102 COURT OF APPEAL Date: 31 JULY 1972 BEFORE: AZU CRABBE J.S.C., LASSEY AND ARCHER JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Odoi v. Hammond [1971] 1 G.L.R. 375, C.A. (2) Appiah v. Baabu, Court of Appeal, 15 May 1967, unreported. (3) Wuta-Ofei v. Dove, Supreme Court, 18

ASANTE v. THE REPUBLIC [1972] 2 GLR 177 HIGH COURT, SUNYANI Date: 10 APRIL 1972 BEFORE: ANTERKYI J. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Kenlin v. Gardiner [1967] 2 Q.B. 510; [1967] 2 W.L.R. 129; [1966] 3 All E.R. 931; 131 J.P. 91; 110 S.J. 848, D.C. (2) R. v. Wilson [1955] 1 W.L.R. 493; 119 J.P.

HIGH COURT, CAPE COAST Date:   4 NOVEMBER 1974 EDWARD WIREDU J   CASES REFERRED TO (1)    Barnard v. National Dock Labour Board [1953] 2 Q. B. 18; [1953] 1 All E.R. 1113; 96 S.J. 331; [1953] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 371, C.A. (2)    Republic v. Inspector-General of Police; Ex parte Wood [1973] 2 G.L.R. 113. (3)

HIGH COURT, ACCRA Date:    4 DECEMBER 1973 ABOAGYE J   NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS CROSS-PETITION for divorce on the ground that the marriage had broken down beyond reconciliation. The facts are sufficiently stated in the judgment. COUNSEL R. K Tay for Amoo-Lamptey for the petitioner. R. K Korsah (Agbesi with him) for the respondent cross-petitioner. [p.134]

SUPREME COURT, ACCRA DATE: 21ST DECEMBER, 1962 BEFORE: SARKODEE-ADOO, MILLS-ODOI AND AKUFO-ADDO, JJ.S.C. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Darcy v. Allen (1602) Moo. K.B. 671; 72 E.R. 830. (2) British Movietonews Ltd. v. London and District Cinemas Ltd. [1950] 2 All E.R. 390, C.A. (3) Parkinson (Sir Lindsay) & Co. v. Commissioners of His Majesty’s Works

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE IN THE SUPREME COURT AD 2008 CORAM:-    DATE-BAH, J.S.C. (PRESIDING) ANSAH, J.S.C. OWUSU, J.S.C. DOTSE, J.S.C. ANIN YEBOAH, J.S.C.  12th NOVEMBER. 2008   JUDGMENT DR. DATE-BAH. J.S.C: This case, with respect, is based on a flawed conception of the nature of a contract of employment. A contract of employment

HIGH COURT, ACCRA DATE: 9TH APRIL, 1962 BEFORE: JIAGGE, J. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS ACTION for recovery of family properties and for accounts. COUNSEL Y. Asare for G. Koranteng-Addow for the plaintiff. Defendants in person. JUDGMENT OF JIAGGE J. The plaintiff’s claim against the first defendant is for recovery of possession of the Osu Tetteh family

SUPREME COURT ACCRA CIVIL APPEAL NO. J4/17/2010 DATE: 1 JUNE, 2011 COUNSEL: KWAMI ADOBOR FOR THE APPELLANT, EKOW AWOONOR (WITH GODWIN DZOKOTO) FOR THE RESPONDENT CORAM: DATE-BAH JSC (PRESIDING) ,DOTSE JSC ,ANIN-YEBOAH JSC, ARYEETEY JSC , AKOTO-BAMFO (MRS) JSC   JUDGEMENT DR. DATE-BAH JSC: Introduction This case is of seminal importance in determining the reach