This submission is not without merit as a judgment against a firm is no more than a judgment against the individuals who constitute the firm. Looking at the matter purely from the point of view of principle, it seems to us that the court cannot set this judgment aside at the instance of Edward Ramia, he being a party to the fraud.
BARCLAYS BANK (D.C.O.) v. HEWARD-MILLS [1964] GLR 332 [1964] SLR (SC) 32 · Supreme Court · 1964 · APALOO JSC
Read it in the judgment