We cannot overemphasize our view that even though Parliament is independent, the Constitution is supreme. Consequently, Parliament, like every organ of the State, including the Judiciary is subject to the Constitution. Accordingly, the clear terms and spirit of Article 2 entrenches the traditional role of the Judiciary, as the final arbiter of what a statute means, and how it should be interpreted. Parliamentary Acts are presumed to be valid, and enacted in accordance with the basic law, the Constitution. However, this presumption is rebuttable and not conclusive. Therefore, absolute deference to parliamentary acts and enactments should not be the standard of the judiciary. In our view, it will be a serious dereliction of the duty of this Court to ignore a clear violation of the spirit of the Constitution.
EZUAME MANNAN V. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL AND SPEAKER OF PARLIAMENT SUIT NO: J1/11/2021 [2022] SLR (SC) 4 · Supreme Court · 2022 · KULENDI JSC
Read it in the judgment