Judgements

DIVISION: IN THE HIGH COURT, KUMASI DATE: 8TH APRIL, 1963 BEFORE: APALOO J. CASES REFERRED TO (1) El-Rouh v. Hamili, High Ct., May 11, 1962 (unreported) (2) El-Rouh v. Hamili [1963] 1 G.L.R. 308, S.C. (3) Hill v. Luton Corporation [1951] 2 K.B. 387; [1951] 1 All E.R. 1028; [1951] 1 T.L.R. 853 (4) Marshall […]

DIVISION: IN THE SUPREME COURT DATE: 8TH APRIL, 1963 BEFORE: OLLENNU, BLAY AND AKUFO-ADDO JJ.S.C. COUNSEL G. D. Ampaw for the applicant. Agadzie for the respondent. JUDGMENT OF COURT In a ruling on a motion on notice for an order for special leave to appeal, their lordships held that, “The jurisdiction of this court under

DIVISION: IN THE SUPREME COURT DATE: 8TH APRIL, 1963 BEFORE: VAN LARE, MILLS-ODOI AND AKUFO-ADDO JJ.S.C. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Craig v. Kanseen [1943] 1 K.B. 256; [1943] 1 All E.R. 108; 112 L.J.K.B. 228; 168 L.T. 38, C.A. (2) Kofi Forfie v. Kwabena Seifah [1958] A.C. 59; [1958] 1 All E.R. 289, P.C. (3)

DIVISION: IN THE SUPREME COURT DATE: 5TH APRIL, 1963 BEFORE: ADUMUA-BOSSMAN, OLLENNU AND BLAY JJ.S.C. COUNSEL Dr. de Graft-Johnson for the appellant. D. F. Annan, Senior State Attorney, for the respondent. JUDGMENT OF ADUMUA-BOSSMAN In its judgment read by Ollennu J.S.C., the Supreme Court applying R v. Abisa Grunshie1 and R. v. Adjei2 held that:

DIVISION: IN THE HIGH COURT, KUMASI DATE: 5TH APRIL, 1963 BEFORE: APALOO J. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Mensah v. Quamina Attopi (1845) Sar. F.L.R.2 (2) Kwaku v. Addo (1957) 2 W.A.L.R. 306 (3) Quacoe v. Dadson (1958) 3 W.A.L.R. 396 NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from the judgment of the Kumasi Circuit Court dismissing plaintiff’s claim

DIVISION: IN THE SUPREME COURT DATE: 25TH MARCH, 1963 BEFORE: ADUMUA-BOSSMAN, BLAY AND AKUFO-ADDO JJ.S.C. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Bedford v. Ellis [1901] A.C. 1; 70 L.J.Ch. 102; 83 L.T. 686, H.L. (2) Smith v. Cardiff Corporation [1954] 1 Q.B. 210; [1953] 2 All E.R.1373; 118 J.P. 33, C.A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from a

DIVISION: IN THE HIGH COURT, ACCRA DATE: 22ND MARCH, 1963 BEFORE: PREMPEH J. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS ACTION for account and injunction based on a breach of contract. COUNSEL G. Koranteng-Addow for the plaintiffs. E. N. Moore for the defendants. JUDGMENT OF PREMPEH J. In this suit the plaintiffs by their amended writ claim against the

DIVISION: IN THE SUPREME COURT DATE: 18TH MARCH, 1963 BEFORE: VAN LARE, MILLS-ODOI AND OLLENNU JJ.S.C. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from a ruling on a preliminary point of law. The High Court exercising its powers under Order 25, r. 3, had dismissed the plaintiff’s claim ruling that it disclosed no cause of action. COUNSEL Dr.

DIVISION: IN THE HIGH COURT, ACCRA DATE: 15TH MARCH, 1963 BEFORE: PREMPEH J. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Strôms Bolag v. Hutchison [1905] A.C. 515; 21 T.L.R. 718; 63 L.T. 562, H.L. (2) Crossfield v. Such (1852) 8 Ex. 159; 155 E.R. 1301; 22 L.J. Ex. 65 (3) Hiort v. London and N. W. Rly. Co.

DIVISION: IN THE SUPREME COURT DATE: 13TH MARCH, 1963 BEFORE: KORSAH C.J., CRABBE AND BLAY JJ.S.C. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Nii Adjei Onano v. Okoi Noi, W.A.C.A., May 30, 1950, unreported. (2) Kwame v. Quaynor [1959] G.L.R. 269, C.A. [p.280] of [1963] 1 GLR 279 NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from a judgment of the High