Judgements

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 10 JULY 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, APALOO AND LASSEY JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Quaye v. Mariamu [1961] G.L.R. 93, S.C. (2) Wiapa v. Solomon (1909) Ren. 410. (3) Kwami v. Quaynor [1959] G.L.R. 269, C.A. (4) Adoaku v. Nyamalor [1963] 1 G.L.R. 279, S.C. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL by the plaintiff […]

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 4 JULY 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, AZU CRABBE AND APALOO JJ.A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from a judgment of the High Court, Accra, dismissing a claim by the plaintiff to recover all sums paid under a hire-purchase agreement and also for damages for wrongful seizure of the subject-matter of the agreement. COUNSEL

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 3 JULY 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, AZU CRABBE AND APALOO JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Ashitey v. Dodoo [1967] G.L.R. 125, C.A (2) Akrong v. Bulley [1965] G.L.R. 469, S.C.(3) Hilton v. Sutton Steam Laundry [1946] K.B. 65; [1945] 2 All E.R. 425; 115 L.J.K.B. 33; 174 L.T. 31, C.A. [p.804] of

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 3 JULY 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, AZU CRABBE AND APALOO JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) Benmax v. Austin Motor Co., Ltd. [1955] A.C. 370; [1955] 2 W.L.R. 418; [1955] 1 All E.R. 326; 99 S.J. 129; 72 R.P.C. 39 H.L. (2) Morris v. West Hartlepool Steam Navigation Co., Ltd. [1956] A.C. 552;

 COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 3 JULY 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, AZU CRABBE AMISSAH JJ.A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL against a ruling of the Ho High Court granting an order of certiorari to quash a judgment of the Anlo Local Court. The facts are fully stated in the judgment of the court. COUNSEL de Graft-Johnson for the

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 3 JULY 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, APALOO AND LASSEY JJ.A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from a decision of the High Court, Kumasi, setting aside a sale of the respondent’s farms to theappellant. The facts are fully stated in the judgment of Ollennu J.A. COUNSEL Osei Nti for the appellant. David S. Effah

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 27 JUNE 1967 BEFORE: AZU CRABBE, APALOO AND AMISSAH JJ.A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL on the question of whether general damages can be awarded against a concessionaire for acts done by him in promotion of the objects of his concession. The facts are fully set out in the judgment of Amissah

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 26 JUNE 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, APALOO AND LASSEY JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) West v. National Motor and Accident Insurance Union Ltd. [1955] 1 W.L.R. 343; [1955] 1 All E.R. 800; 99 S.J. 235; [1955] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 207, C.A. [p.443] of [1967] GLR 442 (2) Jureidini v. National British and

COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 22 JUNE 1967 BEFORE: OLLENNU, AZU CRABBE AND APALOO JJ.A. CASES REFERRED TO (1) State v. Djaba [1966] G.L.R. 575, S.C. affirming sub nom. Djaba v. The State [1966] G.L.R. 327. (2) R. v. Selkirk (1925) 18 Cr.App.R. 172, C.C.A. (3) R. v. Howeson and Hardy (1936) 25 Cr.App.R. 167, C.C.A.

DIVISION: COURT OF APPEAL DATE: 15 JUNE 1967 BEFORE: AZU CRABBE, APALOO AND LASSEY JJ.A. NATURE OF PROCEEDINGS APPEAL from a decision of the circuit court in a matter involving the Workmen’s Compensation Act, 1963. The appeal having [p.434] of [1967] GLR 433 originally been taken to the High Court, it was transferred to the