PRACTICE NOTE: BARON v. LARBI [1962] 1 GLR 168
12 March 1962 · OLLENNU J · ≈ 1 min read
[1962] SLR (HC) 33Other citation styles and permanent link
SLR is the Superlaw Reports citation series assigned by SuperLawGH. It is not an official law report. Suggested styles are a guide, so check your institution’s style guide.
HIGH COURT, ACCRA
DATE:12TH MARCH, 1962
BEFORE: OLLENNU J.
JUDGMENT OF OLLENNU J.
The practice seems to have grown up in the local courts, where there is more than one plaintiff or defendant in a suit, having identical interest in the suit, for one of such plaintiffs or defendants to give evidence on behalf of himself and of all his co-plaintiffs and co-defendants, each of his said colleague’s indicating on oath his consent that his colleague should speak on his behalf. There is nothing wrong with that practice. If anything it is superfluous. A party to a suit is not bound to give evidence and the court cannot compel him to give evidence if he does not want to. And if a party, having gone into the witness-box and sworn or affirmed, elects to give no evidence his opponent is not obliged to cross-examine him. This procedure, therefore, is not irregular, and cannot vitiate the proceedings and the judgment in the case.
(Baron, etc. v. Larbi, Ollennu, J.)
